linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+icZUU-Nd=bjivSZ62iFm3qWSLy-_SyfMcA+xNB9-3oxOwYBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:18:51 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello, Sedat.
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:06:11PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> 1. People should sent their patches concerning especially Linux-Next
>> fixes not only to LKML but also to <linux-next@...r.kernel.org> (if
>> this is not known, pointing to James).
>>
>> 2. These patches for Linux-Next should contain a "-next" in their
>> subject-line (use 'git format-patch --subject-prefix="PATCH -next"
>> ...').
>>
>> Of course, I should have checked the MLs... but for me it was not
>> clear what was the root cause (which subsystem to blame)... I had only
>> some suspicions.
>
> Yeah, there was no way for you guys to easily discover that the
> problem has already been identified and fix pending.  I'll definitely
> try to cc linux-next cc'd on patches which fix problems in -next.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>

Hi Tejun,

BTW, I am reading MLs mostly offline!
That means I cannot grep for search-patterns I like (here: LKML).
Offline-reading also means, you get replies a lot of later.

NO, I am not planning to flood my INBOX with postings from LKML :-).

I highly suggest to send -next patches also to LKML.
Patchwork-service [1] makes it easy to get them in mbox-format for
easy application.

FYI: I am subscribed to linux-next ML and some other "smaller" linux-* MLs.

I dunno why Linux-Next hasn't join patchwork-service.
Stephen?

Also think of multiple postings of patches for the same issue :-).
...and lame and/or disappeared maintainers.

For a more better world...

- Sedat -

[1] marc.info/?l=linux-kernel
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next
[3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/LKML/list/

> --
> tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/