linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] perf stat: add interval printing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBQRZaErbJeJjcCZYzJOFe0WuAN3s5KYVojgTT8N3STKXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:45:56 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] perf stat: add interval printing

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...hat.com> wrote:
> Em Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:26:17PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>> <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>> > Em Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:21:11PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>> >> <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>> >> > Em Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:18:52PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> >> >> This patch adds a new printing mode for perf stat.
>> >> >> It allows internval printing. That means perf stat
>> >> >> can now print event deltas at regular time interval.
>> >> >> This is useful to detect phases in programs.
>> >> >
>> >> > This patch is not applying to my perf/core branch, does it depend on
>> >> > some other outstanding patchset from you?
>> >> >
>> >> > Tomorrow probably all I had in this area will be in Ingo's tree, but
>> >> > can you please take a look at my perf/core branch at:
>> >> >
>> >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux
>> >> >
>> >> My patches are always relative to:
>> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip.tip.git
>> >>
>> >> Do you still need to rebase against your tree?
>> >
>> > Well, userspace code normally is developed on my tree and eventually
>> > goes to the one you mentioned. If you make sure that now, that both are
>> > synched after some weeks, then probably it'll work with my tree.
>> >
>> How's the kernel proper side of your tree sync'd with tip.git? I cannot have
>> the kernel patches for one tree and the perf patches for another. That's a
>> lot of overhead especially when it comes to testing.
>
> Normally regularly, right now it seems all is synched.
>
Ok, will resubmit the series against your tree then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/