linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: ux500: select the DB8540 pin controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:00:59 -0800
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, arm@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: ux500: select the DB8540 pin controller

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:52:31PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> 
> The pin controller is an inherent part of the SoC, without
> it the system will not boot, thus it needs to be selected
> from Kconfig.
> 
> Cc: arm@...nel.org
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> ---
> Requesting ACK from ARM SoC on this patch.

Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>

... but I wonder if this is growing out of hand. Since they will always
be selected (and required) for UX500_SOC_DB8500, why not just make them
silent options that default to y with that as a depend?


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/