lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130128043257.GH3321@blaptop>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:32:57 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
	Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jenifer Hopper <jhopper@...ibm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 6/9] zsmalloc: promote to lib/

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 01:01:16PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:24:37PM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote:
> > This patch promotes the slab-based zsmalloc memory allocator
> > from the staging tree to lib/
> > 
> > zswap depends on this allocator for storing compressed RAM pages
> > in an efficient way under system wide memory pressure where
> > high-order (greater than 0) page allocation are very likely to
> > fail.
> > 
> > For more information on zsmalloc and its internals, read the
> > documentation at the top of the zsmalloc.c file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Seth, zsmalloc has a bug[1], I sent a patch totay. If it want't known,
> it mighte be no problem to promote but it's known bug so let's fix it
> before promoting.
> 
> Another question. Why do you promote zsmalloc in this patchset?
> It might make you hard to merge even zswap into staging.

When I look at [8/9], I realized you are trying to merge this patch
into mm/, NOT staging. I don't know history why zsmalloc/zram/zscache was
in staging at the beginning but personally, I don't ojbect zswap into /mm
directly because I got realized staging is very deep hole to get out,
expecially related to mm stuff. ;-)

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ