[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGK4HS_2=b3gJmDeBTbSmFYk4PB2epMUQE6nkr1XMGfFgmfHvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:21:32 -0800
From: Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@...il.com>
To: Nivedita Singhvi <niveditasinghvi@...il.com>
Cc: Leandro Lucarella <leandro.lucarella@...iomantic.com>,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Doubts about listen backlog and tcp_max_syn_backlog
> + { "ListenDrops", N_("%u SYNs to LISTEN sockets dropped"), opt_number },
>
> (see the file debian/patches/CVS-20081003-statistics.c_sync.patch
> in the net-tools src)
>
> i.e., the netstat pkg is printing the value of the TCPEXT MIB counter
> that's counting TCPExtListenDrops.
>
> Theoretically, that number should be the same as that printed by nstat,
> as they are getting it from the same kernel stats counter. I have not
> looked at nstat code (I actually almost always dump the counters from
> /proc/net/{netstat + snmp} via a simple prettyprint script (will send
> you that offline).
>
nstat pretty much does what you describe which is to parse the
/proc/net files(s) and
print the contents. This is one advantage of nstat over netstat. When
you add a new MIB, you
do not need to update nstat.
> If the nstat and netstat counters don't match, something is fishy.
> That nstat output is broken.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists