[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFTL4hxHUoFchx9wkvfLvOPVRq+P3VSHiZoPRnMJ4YdvzN=TWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 04:29:52 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] cputime: Full dynticks task/cputime accounting v7
2013/1/29 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:
> On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 03:39 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
>> Please send me your kernelspin so I can test as well.
>
> http://rostedt.homelinux.com/private/kernelspin.c
I can't reproduce your issue. I'm getting almost the same results with
vtime + force context tracking and tick based cputime.
3 runs with tick based cputime:
real 0m10.005s
user 0m0.210s
sys 0m9.780s
real 0m10.005s
user 0m0.170s
sys 0m9.820s
real 0m10.005s
user 0m0.130s
sys 0m9.860s
3 runs with vtime + context tracking forced:
real 0m10.005s
user 0m0.807s
sys 0m9.197s
real 0m10.005s
user 0m0.832s
sys 0m9.172s
real 0m10.005s
user 0m0.787s
sys 0m9.218s
> http://rostedt.homelinux.com/private/userspin.c
>
> -- Steve
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists