[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADwDc1CbNeDSNKDh0a01Nde7Mpz3xT6XpsTY4nui8DVt6M40Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:26:47 -0800
From: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
"Mike A. Chan" <mikechan@...gle.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@...el.com>,
Xiaohui Xin <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Bruce Beare <bruce.j.beare@...el.com>,
Tom Keel <thomas.keel@...el.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jamey Sharp <jamey@...ilop.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> Please revert the input changes and add *ONE* new dependency to the
> serport driver.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry
Apologies on this. I must have misunderstood the problem originally,
and I definitely misunderstood your solution until I looked at it
again. I just went through applying the changes I'd created minus the
driver/input changes, plus your SERPORT TTY dependency. You were
right that it solves the dependency issue and is much more elegant. I
thought it was going to leave dangling select dependencies for users
to deal with later. Sorry I was so hesitant at first.
I'll be making up a new patch for Greg after I get it reviewed. And
thank you for your help and persistence in this, Dmitry.
- Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists