[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12263202.uQHxo0zU24@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 02:11:23 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] e1000e: fix resuming from runtime-suspend
On Monday, January 28, 2013 04:05:33 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Rafael, author of patch you cited]
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> > Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133
> > ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
> > Cc: e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> > Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > index fbf75fd..2853c11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > @@ -5691,14 +5691,17 @@ static int e1000_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > + int retval;
> > + bool wake;
> >
> > - if (e1000e_pm_ready(adapter)) {
> > - bool wake;
> > + if (!e1000e_pm_ready(adapter))
> > + return 0;
> >
> > - __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true);
> > - }
> > + retval = __e1000_shutdown(pdev, &wake, true);
> > + if (!retval)
> > + e1000_power_off(pdev, true, wake);
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return retval;
> > }
> >
> > static int e1000_idle(struct device *dev)
> >
I'd like the changelog to say what the bug is and how it is being fixed in
general terms.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists