[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1301281701010.4947@eggly.anvils>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:07:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Petr Holasek <pholasek@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@...ellosystems.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] ksm: NUMA trees and page migration
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:53:10 -0800 (PST)
> Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > Here's a KSM series
>
> Sanity check: do you have a feeling for how useful KSM is?
> Performance/space improvements for typical (or atypical) workloads?
> Are people using it? Successfully?
>
> IOW, is it justifying itself?
I have no idea! To me it's simply a technical challenge - and I agree
with your implication that that's not a good enough justification.
I've added Marcelo and Gleb and the KVM list to the Cc:
my understanding is that it's the KVM guys who really appreciate KSM.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists