[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130129100621.GO23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:06:21 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Matt Sealey <matt@...esi-usa.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben@...tec.co.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux ARM Kernel ML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: One of these things (CONFIG_HZ) is not like the others..
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:13:46PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> To avoid the server latency, we didn't do continuous sync. The time was
> synced in the beginning and after 62.5 hours (#ntpd -qg) and the drift
> of about 174 ms was observed. As you said this could be because of
> server sync time along with probably some addition from system calls
> from #ntpd. As mentioned, the other run with HZ = 128 which started
> 15 hours 20 mins is already showing about 24 mS drift now. I will
> let it run for couple of more days just to have similar duration run.
Hmm. I wonder if ntpd -qg will cause ntp to read the drift file and
adjust the kernel time keeping using that information...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists