linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] dasd: Implement block timeout handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130129113228.GA5984@osiris>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:32:28 +0100
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Weinhuber <wein@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] dasd: Implement block timeout handling

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:11:56AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> This patch implements generic block layer timeout handling
> callbacks for DASDs. When the timeout expires the respective
> cqr is aborted.
> 
> With this timeout handler time-critical request abort
> is guaranteed as the abort does not depend on the internal
> state of the various DASD driver queues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
> Acked-by: Stefan Weinhuber <wein@...ibm.com>

[...]

> +enum blk_eh_timer_return dasd_times_out(struct request *req)
> +{
> +	struct dasd_ccw_req *cqr = req->completion_data;
> +	struct dasd_block *block = req->q->queuedata;
> +	struct dasd_device *device;
> +	int rc = 0;
> +
> +	if (!cqr)
> +		return BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED;
> +
> +	device = cqr->startdev ? cqr->startdev : block->base;
> +	DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_WARNING, device,
> +		      " dasd_times_out cqr %p status %x",
> +		      cqr, cqr->status);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&block->queue_lock);
> +	spin_lock(get_ccwdev_lock(device->cdev));

        ^^^

> +	cqr->retries = -1;
> +	cqr->intrc = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	if (cqr->status >= DASD_CQR_QUEUED) {
> +		spin_unlock(get_ccwdev_lock(device->cdev));
> +		rc = dasd_cancel_req(cqr);
> +	} else if (cqr->status == DASD_CQR_FILLED ||
> +		   cqr->status == DASD_CQR_NEED_ERP) {
> +		cqr->status = DASD_CQR_TERMINATED;
> +		spin_unlock(get_ccwdev_lock(device->cdev));
> +	} else if (cqr->status == DASD_CQR_IN_ERP) {
> +		struct dasd_ccw_req *searchcqr, *nextcqr, *tmpcqr;
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry_safe(searchcqr, nextcqr,
> +					 &block->ccw_queue, blocklist) {
> +			tmpcqr = searchcqr;
> +			while (tmpcqr->refers)
> +				tmpcqr = tmpcqr->refers;
> +			if (tmpcqr != cqr)
> +				continue;
> +			/* searchcqr is an ERP request for cqr */
> +			searchcqr->retries = -1;
> +			searchcqr->intrc = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +			if (searchcqr->status >= DASD_CQR_QUEUED) {
> +				spin_lock(get_ccwdev_lock(device->cdev));

				^^^
This looks like a potential dead lock.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/