lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:48:51 +0100
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] perf stat: add interval printing

Arnaldo,

V7 posted. It's a rebase done against your perf/core, was no big deal.
Let me know if it works for you now.


On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...hat.com> wrote:
> Em Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:45:56PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>> <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>> > Em Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:26:17PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
>> >> <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
>> >> > Em Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:21:11PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> >> >> My patches are always relative to:
>> >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip.tip.git
>
>> >> >> Do you still need to rebase against your tree?
>
>> >> > Well, userspace code normally is developed on my tree and eventually
>> >> > goes to the one you mentioned. If you make sure that now, that both are
>> >> > synched after some weeks, then probably it'll work with my tree.
>
>> >> How's the kernel proper side of your tree sync'd with tip.git? I cannot have
>> >> the kernel patches for one tree and the perf patches for another. That's a
>> >> lot of overhead especially when it comes to testing.
>
>> > Normally regularly, right now it seems all is synched.
>
>> Ok, will resubmit the series against your tree then.
>
> Also everytime Ingo merges I rebase my tree against tip/perf/core, if
> you ever need something that is in some other branch that everybody
> agrees will go upstream, like tip/perf/urgent or Linus's, just let me
> know and I'll coordinate with Ingo and merge it into acme/perf/core.
>
> Talking about that I need to merge tip/perf/urgent, Jiri needs that
> precise attribute revert...
>
> - Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists