linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: tegra: adapt tegra periph clk to mux table/mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5107FB1E.3010907@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:38:54 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: tegra: adapt tegra periph clk to mux table/mask

On 01/29/2013 02:51 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:49:53PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 01/28/2013 08:54 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>>> The tegra peripheral clock type uses struct clk_mux directly, so it needs to
>>> be updated to handle the new mask and table fields. Also the macros need
>>> to be updated
>>
>> Just a quick note on patch dependencies here:
>>
>> Patch 1/2 can presumably be taken through the clk tree whenever Mike is
>> OK with it.
>>
>> Patch 2/2 depends on patches in the Tegra tree for 3.9. Since patch 2/2
>> is useful mostly for the Tegra114 clock driver, and I don't imagine that
>> will get posted/merged in time for 3.9, it's probably easiest to just
>> take patch 2/2 for 3.10 along with the Tegra114 clock driver. Also, I
>> imagine there won't be any more clk/Tegra tree dependencies in 3.10, so
>> patch 2/2 and the Tegra114 clk driver patches can likely go through the
>> clk tree itself for 3.10.
> 
> No. Because 1/2 changes struct clk_mux and the tegra peripheral clock type 
> uses struct clk_mux directly, 2/2 needs to be applied together with 1/2, even
> if the new functionality is not yet used.

Oh, then they can't be two separate patches then, or "git bisect" won't
work. I guess it's best to wait for 3.10 for this:-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/