linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130130075057.3f03382b0c6e230850f60514@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:50:57 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port

Hi Vineet,

On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:44:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:24 +0530 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen, can you please add the following branch (rebased off 3.8-rc5) to linux-next
> > 
> > git://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/linux.git  arc-next
> 
> Added from today (though there may not be a linux-next release today).
> 
> > While the first pull request can go directly from github, I presume the logistics
> > for setting up accounts on kernel.org will only kick start after the first batch
> > of code has been accepted. I can't seem to find any discussions on lists to that
> > effect.
> 
> Linus prefers to not pull from github, but will if you ask him to pull a
> tag signed with a verifiable gpg key.  This is not a requirement if your
> tree is on kernel.org (though you still need a verifiable gpg key to get
> a kernel.org account).

I forgot the legal boilerplate:

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgment of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
	Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell 
sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Legal Stuff:
By participating in linux-next, your subsystem tree contributions are
public and will be included in the linux-next trees.  You may be sent
e-mail messages indicating errors or other issues when the
patches/commits from your subsystem tree are merged and tested in
linux-next.  These messages may also be cross-posted to the linux-next
mailing list, the linux-kernel mailing list, etc.  The linux-next tree
project and IBM (my employer) make no warranties regarding the linux-next
project, the testing procedures, the results, the e-mails, etc.  If you
don't agree to these ground rules, let me know and I'll remove your tree
from participation in linux-next.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped