[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda_XOG_ASEGSmERY3W7zCYG4qGVXQX=cKETaah=YJMO3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:08:41 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...t.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] pinctrl: exynos: don't mark probing functions as __init
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> Functions called from a driver probe() method must not be
> marked __init, because they may get called after the
> init phase is done, when the device shows up late, or
> because of deferred probing.
>
> Without this patch, building exynos_defconfig results in
> multiple warnings like:
>
> WARNING: drivers/pinctrl/built-in.o(.text+0x51bc): Section mismatch in reference from the function exynos5440_pinctrl_probe() to the function .init.text:exynos5440_gpiolib_register()
> The function exynos5440_pinctrl_probe() references
> the function __init exynos5440_gpiolib_register().
> This is often because exynos5440_pinctrl_probe lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of exynos5440_gpiolib_register is wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Applied with Kukjin's ACK, thanks!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists