[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130129155917.4ee64214.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:59:17 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Mike Lykov <combr@...dex.ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
kirill@...temov.name
Subject: Re: [BUG?] false positive in soft lockup detector while unlzma
initramfs on slow cpu
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:33:48 -0500
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> wrote:
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,14 @@ static int __init softlockup_panic_setup(char *str)
> }
> __setup("softlockup_panic=", softlockup_panic_setup);
>
> +static int __init watchdog_thresh_setup(char *str)
> +{
> + watchdog_thresh = simple_strtoul(str, NULL, 0);
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("watchdog_thresh=", watchdog_thresh_setup);
I wonder if there's some magical way in which we can set any sysctl
from the kernel command line. Add sys.vm.min_free_kbytes=42 to the
command line, walk the hierarchy late in boot...
To address Mike's bug I suggest we poke a touch_softlockup_watchdog()
into the appropriate place. Presumably the loop in
lib/decompress_unlzma.c:unlzma(). The decompress code makes me cry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists