[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4302d59f-5c87-4b82-af16-9f54625fc9ce@email.android.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:27:15 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
vgoyal@...hat.com, horms@...ge.net.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 e820: Introduce memmap=resetusablemap for kdump usage
To be more clear: the max_pfn stuff seems like a relic of the past, and I am wondering what it would take to get rid of it.
It clearly has the wrong semantics, except perhaps in the most trivial allocator models.
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:11 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> On 01/28/2013 06:10 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> kexec-tools will change that to E820_KDUMP_RESERVED (or other good
>name).
>>>
>>> We only need to update kernel to get old max_pfn by
>>> checking E820_KDUMP_RESERVED.
>>>
>>
>> OK, I have asked this before, but I still have not gotten any
>acceptable
>> answer:
>>
>> Why do we still have max_*_pfn at all? Shouldn't it all be based on
>> memblocks by now?
>
>saved_max_pfn is used for kdump:
>drivers/char/mem.c::read_oldmem will stop there.
>...
> while (count) {
> pfn = *ppos / PAGE_SIZE;
> if (pfn > saved_max_pfn)
> return read;
>...
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists