linux-kernel - Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:42:04 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 02:32:56PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Konstantin has some fixes for an e1000e power management issue related
> to suspend/resume that he observed on an x220. He didn't see an NMI,
> and apparently his problem has been around for a long time,

Yeah, this is one of those issues you don't see *every* s/r cycle and
besides, I just got this box and haven't run 3.{6,7} on it yet (maybe
never will :-)).

> so no idea whether it could be related. I just noticed the conjunction
> of thinkpad/e1000e/resume/power saving in both reports.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/18/147

Yes, thanks Bjorn, that was a good suggestion. Btw, from reading the
thread, those patches still need cooking a bit more, AFAICR people's
objections/comments. Or should I go ahead and test them?

It's just that I'm overly cautious every time I hear e1000e is involved:

www.linux-magazine.com/content/download/62169/484085/file/Security_Lessons_Ftrace.pdf

:-)

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/