linux-kernel - RE: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <076401cdfe9f$6a0f5fa0$3e2e1ee0$@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:08:07 -0800
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To:	'Sachin Kamat' <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	'Linus Walleij' <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	'LKML' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	'linux-samsung-soc' <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch

Sachin Kamat wrote:
> 
> >> This patch is required along with the
> >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440"
> >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into
> >> mainline. Without the missing patch we get the following boot up
> >> warnings and subsequent failures with dt boot on 4412 based board:
> >
> > Hm I didn't realize there was a dependency between these
> > patches, oh well, better get the pull for the pinctrl tree finished
> > off then...
> 
> Ideally those 2 patches should have been squashed together.
> 
Err, Sachin, what are you talking about? As you said, one patch has been
merged into the mainline, so how does it can be squashed? In this case, just
applying the other patch into pinctrl-fixes is enough.

Thanks.

- Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/