linux-kernel - [PATCH 7/7] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1359527457-6837-8-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:30:57 +0800
From:	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
To:	mingo@...nel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, acme@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com,
	namhyung@...nel.org, "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack

From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>

"Zero length call" uses the attribute of the call instruction to push
the immediate instruction pointer on to the stack and then pops off
that address into a register. This is accomplished without any matching
return instruction. It confuses the hardware and make the recorded call
stack incorrect. Try fixing the call stack by discarding zero length
call entries.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
index 910200b..0546689 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ enum {
 	X86_BR_ABORT		= 1 << 12,/* transaction abort */
 	X86_BR_INTX		= 1 << 13,/* in transaction */
 	X86_BR_NOTX		= 1 << 14,/* not in transaction */
-	X86_BR_CALL_STACK	= 1 << 15,/* call stack */
+	X86_BR_ZERO_CALL	= 1 << 15,/* zero length call */
+	X86_BR_CALL_STACK	= 1 << 16,/* call stack */
 };
 
 #define X86_BR_PLM (X86_BR_USER | X86_BR_KERNEL)
@@ -103,13 +104,15 @@ enum {
 	 X86_BR_JMP	 |\
 	 X86_BR_IRQ	 |\
 	 X86_BR_ABORT	 |\
-	 X86_BR_IND_CALL)
+	 X86_BR_IND_CALL |\
+	 X86_BR_ZERO_CALL)
 
 #define X86_BR_ALL (X86_BR_PLM | X86_BR_ANY)
 
 #define X86_BR_ANY_CALL		 \
 	(X86_BR_CALL		|\
 	 X86_BR_IND_CALL	|\
+	 X86_BR_ZERO_CALL	|\
 	 X86_BR_SYSCALL		|\
 	 X86_BR_IRQ		|\
 	 X86_BR_INT)
@@ -625,6 +628,12 @@ static int branch_type(unsigned long from, unsigned long to, int abort)
 		ret = X86_BR_INT;
 		break;
 	case 0xe8: /* call near rel */
+		insn_get_immediate(&insn);
+		if (insn.immediate1.value == 0) {
+			/* zero length call */
+			ret = X86_BR_ZERO_CALL;
+			break;
+		}
 	case 0x9a: /* call far absolute */
 		ret = X86_BR_CALL;
 		break;
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/