| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:53:03 +0900 From: Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: PL011: Add support for Rx DMA buffer polling > Then it can use DMA polling post-wakeup? Yes, It will be switched back to DMA polling on UART IRQ. > What do you mean by "user" here? Userspace? Or > "platform data parameter"? platform data parameter > Not platform I think. Per usecase. > Are you not actually thinking about things like the above? > These are usecase requirements, not platform requirements. I mean that: Platform knows the requirement of it's ports (It can be usecase above) and can set the poll rate with platform data parameter. Some port is enough to do with slow poll rate, some need fast poll rate for the fast response. Of course some port don't need rx dma and polling, in this case we can set the poll rate to 0. If we fix the poll rate to the scale of baud rate, we don't have such flexibility. Anyway I just want to know we still need auto scale of poll rate. If this become clear, I will prepare v3 of this patch. Thanks Chanho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists