[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5108CFC1.8010905@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:46:09 +0800
From: Mark Zhang <nvmarkzhang@...il.com>
To: Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
CC: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Mark Zhang <markz@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"gnurou@...il.com" <gnurou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] drm: tegra: use the Common Display Framework
On 01/30/2013 03:01 PM, Alex Courbot wrote:
> On 01/30/2013 03:50 PM, Mark Zhang wrote:
[...]
>
>>> + /* register display notifier */
>>> + output->display_notifier.dev = NULL;
>>
>> Set "display_notifier.dev" to NULL makes we have to compare with every
>> display entity, just like what you do in "display_notify_callback":
>>
>> entity->dev && entity->dev->of_node == pnode
>>
>> So can we get the "struct device *" of panel here? Seems currently the
>> "of" framework doesn't allow "device_node -> device".
>
> Nope. AFAICT the device might not be instanciated at this point. We
> become aware of it for the first time in the callback function. We also
> don't want to defer probing until the panel is parsed first, since the
> panel might also depend on resources of the display device.
>
Agree.
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists