[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh2x==Ng1=iHOj-55mUTWCwpaJpRXjiQyfxz-a48ALDOW3aiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:31:04 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dw_dmac: adjust slave_id accordingly to request line base
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> We get a device from the ACPI CSRT table. During enumeration we don't
> know what kind of the device it is. From the enumeration point of view
> each device enumerated from CSRT is a platform device (see
> drivers/acpi/csrt.c for the details).
>
> That's why we have to pass this info somehow to the DMAC driver. And
> like Mika already mentioned we have no other generic way except
> IORESOURCE_DMA. If you have something better in mind, please share. We
> could adopt our code then.
You don't need this in DT case too? Or only for ACPI case?
I think "Yes" is the answer of both the questions. If so, then you
can keep it this way or add another variable in platform data.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists