[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9yfHxhwRXCeqb0YbkP74MXgnOOqTNVvtv0ykHnVBB+aiCbKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:45:46 +0530
From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Failure due to missing (Exynos related) pinctrl patch
Hi Linus,
On 30 January 2013 15:18, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com> wrote:
>> Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>
>>> >> This patch is required along with the
>>> >> patch "gpio: samsung: fix pinctrl condition for exynos and exynos5440"
>>> >> (mainline commit Id: e4a5da51) which has already made it into
>>> >> mainline. Without the missing patch we get the following boot up
>>> >> warnings and subsequent failures with dt boot on 4412 based board:
>>> >
>>> > Hm I didn't realize there was a dependency between these
>>> > patches, oh well, better get the pull for the pinctrl tree finished
>>> > off then...
>
> Torvalds has already pulled it in -> problem solved. :-)
>
I tested this on Linus T.'s latest tip (2e51b231) and the problem
still persists :(
You sent the following patch in your pull request to Linus T.:
Kukjin Kim (1):
pinctrl: samsung: removing duplicated condition for PINCTRL_SAMSUNG
However, the missing dependent patch is:
"pinctrl: exynos: change PINCTRL_EXYNOS option"
--
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists