linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] MFD: ti_am335x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:40:09 +0100
From:	Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>
To:	"Patil, Rachna" <rachna@...com>
Cc:	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Benit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] MFD: ti_am335x_tscadc: Add DT support


Op 24 jan. 2013, om 04:45 heeft "Patil, Rachna" <rachna@...com> het volgende geschreven:

> From: "Patil, Rachna" <rachna@...com>
> 
> Make changes to add DT support in the MFD core driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patil, Rachna <rachna@...com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> 	Non-standard properties prefixed with vendor name.
> 
> drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> index e9f3fb5..87b446b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> 
> #include <linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h>
> #include <linux/input/ti_am335x_tsc.h>
> @@ -64,20 +66,31 @@ static	int ti_tscadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 	struct resource		*res;
> 	struct clk		*clk;
> 	struct mfd_tscadc_board	*pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +	struct device_node	*node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> 	struct mfd_cell		*cell;
> 	int			err, ctrl;
> 	int			clk_value, clock_rate;
> -	int			tsc_wires, adc_channels = 0, total_channels;
> +	int			tsc_wires = 0, adc_channels = 0, total_channels;
> 
> -	if (!pdata) {
> +	if (!pdata && !pdev->dev.of_node) {
> 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not find platform data\n");
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 	}
> 
> -	if (pdata->adc_init)
> -		adc_channels = pdata->adc_init->adc_channels;
> +	if (pdev->dev.platform_data) {
> +		if (pdata->tsc_init)
> +			tsc_wires = pdata->tsc_init->wires;
> +
> +		if (pdata->adc_init)
> +			adc_channels = pdata->adc_init->adc_channels;
> +	} else {
> +		node = of_find_node_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "tsc");
> +		of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,wires", &tsc_wires);
> +
> +		node = of_find_node_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "adc");
> +		of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,adc-channels", &adc_channels);
> +	}

Since AM335x is DT only, why is there a platform data codepath and why is it the first branch it tries? And I guess the next question is related to the first: why doesn't it work when used with DT? When I copy over the nodes from the evm.dts to my board I get "tsc tsc: Missing platform data" in dmesg.

What are the chances this driver will work when applied on top of 3.8-rcX? Has it even been tested with that? Has it been tested at all?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/