| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130130114233.GD32315@balto.lan> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:42:33 +0100 From: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@...ricsson.com>, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: handle SW coordinated CPUs On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 04:47:58PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 30 January 2013 16:34, Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> wrote: > > Small sidenote, actually what I'm going to drop here i *cdbs, as I need > > cpu for schedule_delayed_work_on and can't use cdbs->cpu for that as > > it's the master's one. > > I can't find code which would do j_cdbs->cpu = j and so j_cdbs->cpu is > un-initialized. So, if that's true, you can initialize that and drop > cpu param too. Right, it looks like cdbs->cpu is not really needed anymore. Anyway I'm quite happy with how it came out passing cpu number, code is a bit more compact, so I'm sending that version and than we can discuss if recycle cdbs->cpu or just drop it. Fabio -- Fabio Baltieri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists