linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:32:26 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial write

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:11:08AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > How about this?
> > ------------------------- >8 -------------------------------
> > 
> > From 9f8756ae0b0f2819f93cb94dcd38da372843aa12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:58:52 +0900
> > Subject: [RESEND PATCH v5 1/4] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial read/write
> > 
> > Now zram allocates new page with GFP_KERNEL in zram I/O path
> > if IO is partial. Unfortunately, It may cause deadlock with
> > reclaim path like below.
> > 
> > write_page from fs
> > fs_lock
> > allocation(GFP_KERNEL)
> > reclaim
> > pageout
> > 				write_page from fs
> > 				fs_lock <-- deadlock
> > 
> > This patch fixes it by using GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_NOIO.
> > In read path, we called kmap_atomic so that we need GFP_ATOMIC
> > while we need GFP_NOIO in write path.
> 
> The patch description makes sense now. Thanks!
> 
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > We could use GFP_IO instead of GFP_ATOMIC in zram_bvec_read with
> > some modification related to buffer allocation in case of partial IO.
> > But it needs more churn and prevent merge this patch into stable
> > if we should send this to stable so I'd like to keep it as simple
> > as possbile. GFP_IO usage could be separate patch after we merge it.
> 
> I don't see why something like below couldn't be merged for stable.
> Going for GFP_ATOMIC might seem like the simplest thing to go for but
> usually bites you in the end.

Looks good to me. I will resend it.
Thanks, Pekka.

> 
> 			Pekka
> 
> ------------------------- >8 -------------------------------
> 
> >From 936a12b423c58542628d6fd683e859f752eb3d41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:58:52 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] zram: Fix deadlock bug in partial read/write
> 
> Now zram allocates new page with GFP_KERNEL in zram I/O path
> if IO is partial. Unfortunately, It may cause deadlock with
> reclaim path like below.
> 
> write_page from fs
> fs_lock
> allocation(GFP_KERNEL)
> reclaim
> pageout
> 				write_page from fs
> 				fs_lock <-- deadlock
> 
> This patch fixes it by using GFP_NOIO.  In read path, we
> reorganize code flow so that kmap_atomic is called after the
> GFP_NOIO allocation.
> 
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> [ penberg@...nel.org: don't use GFP_ATOMIC ]
> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> index f2a73bd..071e058 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -228,11 +228,12 @@ static int zram_bvec_read(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
>  	if (is_partial_io(bvec))
>  		/* Use  a temporary buffer to decompress the page */
> -		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	else
> +		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
> +
> +	user_mem = kmap_atomic(page);
> +	if (!is_partial_io(bvec))
>  		uncmem = user_mem;
>  
>  	if (!uncmem) {
> @@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
>  		 * This is a partial IO. We need to read the full page
>  		 * before to write the changes.
>  		 */
> -		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		uncmem = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
>  		if (!uncmem) {
>  			pr_info("Error allocating temp memory!\n");
>  			ret = -ENOMEM;
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/