[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130130165321.GD30559@balto.lan>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:53:21 +0100
From: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
swarren@...dotorg.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only
when necessary
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:23:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 30 January 2013 18:30, Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> wrote:
> > Modify conservative timer to not resample CPU utilization if recently
> > sampled from another SW coordinated core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
>
> We are again doing the same mistake which i fixed with:
>
> commit 4471a34f9a1f2da220272e823bdb8e8fa83a7661
> Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Date: Fri Oct 26 00:47:42 2012 +0200
>
> cpufreq: governors: remove redundant code
Can't argue with this, but the two had some subdle differences (namely
th two dbs_info structures) and I opted to not mess up forcing some
non-obvious common code.
Feel free to suggest a strategy.
Thanks,
Fabio
--
Fabio Baltieri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists