linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpokzBsEQBAPSFTxcC52QmGxst1T-=pzk-E4+dgvyTsiM6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:42:29 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	swarren@...dotorg.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only
 when necessary

On 30 January 2013 22:23, Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:23:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> Can't argue with this, but the two had some subdle differences (namely
> th two dbs_info structures) and I opted to not mess up forcing some
> non-obvious common code.
>
> Feel free to suggest a strategy.

Just check the patch i mentioned, go ahead with something similar. There
is a lot of code in my original patch which removed redundancy to a big level.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/