[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130130154725.f7b40daa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:47:25 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hlist: drop the node parameter from iterators
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:08:30 -0500
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> Also, ping :)
>
> ...
>
> > 216 files changed, 1031 insertions(+), 1526 deletions(-)
Whimper.
I don't really see a sane way of avoiding a single huge atomic smash
here. Normally we'd use a multistep process:
1: Create a new and differently named macro, say "sasha_is_a_pita()".
2: Convert hlist_for_each_entry() to sasha_is_a_pita() in as many
sites as we can.
3: Once we think all sites are converted, delete the now-unused
hlist_for_each_entry() definition.
Problem is, there just isn't any other identifier we can use here apart
from hlist_for_each_entry().
I suppose we could add additional steps:
4: Add hlist_for_each_entry(), which is identical to sasha_is_a_pita().
5: Convert sasha_is_a_pita() to hlist_for_each_entry() in as many
sites as we can.
6: Once we think all sites are converted, delete the now-unused
sasha_is_a_pita() definition.
But geeze.
The alternative is to do the huge atomic smash immediately after the
3.9-rc1 release, when the amount of pending out-of-tree code is at a
minimum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists