[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA9183426FE@sacexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:18:06 +0000
From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] nfs: idr_destroy() no longer needs
idr_remove_all()
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 17:58 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:31:09PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > idr_destroy() can destroy idr by itself and idr_remove_all() is being
> > deprecated. Drop reference to idr_remove_all(). Note that the code
> > wasn't completely correct before because idr_remove() on all entries
> > doesn't necessarily release all idr_layers which could lead to memory
> > leak.
>
> Seems fine, but actually this is client-side so I think you meant the cc
> to be to Trond.
Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
No problems whatsoever with removing a comment. :-)
My worry is more about Tejun's comment that we did actually need a call
to idr_remove_all() in the original code. Do we need to queue up a fix
for the 3.8 and existing stable kernels?
Cheers
Trond
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
> > Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> > This patch depends on an earlier idr patch and given the trivial
> > nature of the patch, I think it would be best to route these together
> > through -mm. Please holler if there's any objection.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > fs/nfs/client.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
> > index 9f3c664..84d8eae 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/client.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
> > @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ error_0:
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_alloc_client);
> >
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_V4)
> > -/* idr_remove_all is not needed as all id's are removed by nfs_put_client */
> > void nfs_cleanup_cb_ident_idr(struct net *net)
> > {
> > struct nfs_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfs_net_id);
> > --
> > 1.8.1
> >
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer
NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists