[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokR7-P9BarUwW++Exh8RyHUYFHO4V80+zHqcA-zwCOurg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:12:29 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
swarren@...dotorg.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
On 31 January 2013 14:09, Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org> wrote:
> Ok, now I see the problem: cdbs->cpu is initialized only on the leader
> cpu and this is working by coincidence on my system, while
> cdbs->time_stamp is initialized only on the leader cpu, and that should
> be correct even when cpu hotplugging as that's reinitialized every time.
>
> That's a fix so I'll send a patch just to set ->cpu into the
> for_each_cpu cycle.
That's not enough. You need to set ->cpu to j and not policy->cpu as we
discussed it earlier (params to timer init and exit.).
And so, we need to get policy->cpu somehow and get its timestamp.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists