[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A4887BF146CD57468F700B415D2F4701581C4A@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:11:30 +0000
From: "Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish" <manishv.b@...com>
To: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"khilman@...prootsystems.com" <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC] davinci: poll for sleep completion in resume
routine.
Hi Sekhar
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 15:21:42, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>
>
> On 1/31/2013 2:56 PM, Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish wrote:
> > As per OMAP-L138 TRM, Software must poll for SLEEPCOMPLETE bit until
> > it is set to 1 before clearing SLEEPENABLE bit in DEEPSLEEP register
> > in resume routine.
> > Modifications are as per datasheet:
> > http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruh77a/spruh77a.pdf
> > See sections 10.10.2.2 and 11.5.21 for more detailed explanation.
> >
> > Tested on da850-evm.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish <manishv.b@...com>
>
> Is this a bug fix? Do you see any issue without this patch?
This is not a bug fix. I have not seen any issue without this patch.
Only, modifications are done as per OMAP-L138 TRM.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>
Regards,
Manish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists