[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1359639529.31386.49.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:38:49 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au, 695182@...s.debian.org
Cc: dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: Bug#695182: [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 20:07 +1100, paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au wrote:
> Dear Ben,
>
> Thanks for the repeated explanations.
>
> > PAE was a stop-gap ...
> > ... [PAE] completely untenable.
>
> Is this a good time to withdraw PAE, to tell the world that it does not
> work? Maybe you should have had such comments in the code.
>
> Seems that amd64 now works "somewhat": on Debian the linux-image package
> is tricky to install,
If you do an i386 (userland) installation then you must either select
expert mode to get a choice of kernel packages, or else install the
'amd64' kernel package afterward.
> and linux-headers is even harder.
In what way?
> Is there work being done to make this smoother?
[...]
Debian users are now generally installing a full amd64 (userland and
kernel installation. The default installation image linked from
www.debian.org is the 32/64-bit net-installer which will install amd64
if the system is capable of it.
Based on your experience I might propose to change the automatic kernel
selection for i386 so that we use 'amd64' on a system with >16GB RAM and
a capable processor.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists