linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: Ux500: Fix build error pertaining to missing include file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130131141019.GA13321@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:10:21 +0800
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: Ux500: Fix build error pertaining to missing
 include file

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:07:35PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm a bit surprised the compiler would change something like that, I'd
> > expect it to be more the build system.

> You've lost me.

> When I compile this file it succeeds. When the person who reported
> this bug compiles, it fails with the error above.

> mop500_ab8500.h is actually in the same directory as the file
> including it, so it should by rights be encapsulated in "" and not <>,
> right?

Yes, it should - but this is also something that can be overridden by
the build system.  It'd seem surprising for a compiler vendor to change
their behaviour here as there's limited benefit in changing and much
potential for error.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)