[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1301311002190.1876-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:04:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>
cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
<linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: Fix ohci free_irq() warning
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Mark Einon wrote:
> >> > >> This patch fixes the kernel warning generated when putting an MSI MS-1727
> >> > >> GT740 laptop into suspend mode. The call sequence in this case calls
> >> > >> free_irq() twice, once in pci_remove() and once then in pci_suspend().
> >> > >
> >> > > You mean /first/ in pci_suspend() and /then/ in pci_remove() on the
> >> > > already suspended devices, right?
> >> >
> >> > Yes, I did. The call sequence is suspend then resume. My bad.
> >
> > Why does the pci_suspend routine call free_irq() at all? As far as I
> > know, it's not supposed to do that. Won't the device continue to use
> > the same IRQ after it is resumed?
>
> This sounds reasonable to me - I think we could probably get rid of
> the request_irq() call from resume, and use
> disable_irq()/enable_irq()?
Why mess around with IRQ settings at all? Just have the suspend
routine tell the controller to stop generating them.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists