[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1301311004050.1876-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:09:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Shane Huang <shane.huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] block: add runtime pm helpers
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > +void blk_pm_runtime_init(struct request_queue *q, struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + q->dev = dev;
> > > + q->rpm_status = RPM_ACTIVE;
> > > + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(q->dev, -1);
> > > + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(q->dev);
> > > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(q->dev);
> > > + pm_runtime_autosuspend(q->dev);
> >
> > This last line is no longer needed. It can't do anything useful, since
> > autosuspends are disabled (the delay is -1).
>
> Right, thanks.
> And the mark_last_busy can probably be removed too, it didn't make much
> sense here and we can add "driver should call pm_runtime_mark_last_busy
> and pm_runtime_autosuspend in its runtime idle callback" to the kernel
> doc. What do you think?
Yes, okay.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists