[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130131013823.GG2244@beef>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:38:23 -0500
From: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Devicetree Discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux DaVinci Kernel List
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux SPI Devel List
<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/10] dmaengine: add
dma_request_slave_channel_compat()
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:27:18AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote:
> > Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts
> > both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and
> > dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is
> > instantiated via DT, the appropriate channel request call will be
> > made.
> >
> > This allows for a much cleaner migration of drivers to the
> > dmaengine DT API as platforms continue to be mixed between those
> > that boot using DT and those that do not.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> > @@ -1001,6 +1001,22 @@ void dma_run_dependencies(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx);
> > struct dma_chan *dma_find_channel(enum dma_transaction_type tx_type);
> > struct dma_chan *net_dma_find_channel(void);
> > #define dma_request_channel(mask, x, y) __dma_request_channel(&(mask), x, y)
> > +#define dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask, x, y, dev, name) \
> > + __dma_request_slave_channel_compat(&(mask), x, y, dev, name)
> > +
> > +static inline struct dma_chan
> > +*__dma_request_slave_channel_compat(dma_cap_mask_t *mask, dma_filter_fn fn,
> > + void *fn_param, struct device *dev,
> > + char *name)
> > +{
> > + struct dma_chan *chan;
> > +
> > + chan = dma_request_slave_channel(dev, name);
> > + if (chan)
> > + return chan;
> > +
> > + return __dma_request_channel(mask, fn, fn_param);
> > +}
>
> After I have spent some more time with implementing the code for dw_dma,
> I think the mask is actually unnecessary here, the helper could just
> always set it to DMA_SLAVE before calling __dma_request_channel.
>
> It's not a bug to do it this way though, and it may help convert drivers
> a little easier if there is less to change.
Agreed.
-Matt
>
> Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists