linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: hide ENTRY messages behind ctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1450113.teKM2dvJbO@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:54:01 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: hide ENTRY messages behind ctrl_dbg()

On Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:13:17 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Rafael]
> 
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> > In each suspend and resume cycle my laptop prints these messages at
> > KERN_INFO level:
> >     pciehp 0000:00:1c.1:pcie04: pciehp_suspend ENTRY
> >     pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie04: pciehp_suspend ENTRY
> >
> > and
> >     pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie04: pciehp_resume ENTRY
> >     pciehp 0000:00:1c.1:pcie04: pciehp_resume ENTRY
> >
> > Messages like these are probably only useful while debugging pciehp, so
> > let's hide them behind the ctrl_dbg() macro.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
> > ---
> > 0) Compile tested only!
> >
> > 1) Perhaps a better solution is to drop these messages entirely.
> >
> >  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> > index 939bd1d..ed1702d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
> > @@ -293,7 +293,8 @@ static void pciehp_remove(struct pcie_device *dev)
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> >  static int pciehp_suspend (struct pcie_device *dev)
> >  {
> > -       dev_info(&dev->device, "%s ENTRY\n", __func__);
> > +       struct controller *ctrl = get_service_data(dev);
> > +       ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s ENTRY\n", __func__);
> >         return 0;
> 
> I'd propose to just drop these messages completely.  Rafael, would you
> have any objection to that?

No, I wouldn't.

> 
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -303,8 +304,8 @@ static int pciehp_resume (struct pcie_device *dev)
> >         struct slot *slot;
> >         u8 status;
> >
> > -       dev_info(&dev->device, "%s ENTRY\n", __func__);
> >         ctrl = get_service_data(dev);
> > +       ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "%s ENTRY\n", __func__);
> >
> >         /* reinitialize the chipset's event detection logic */
> >         pcie_enable_notification(ctrl);
> > --

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/