[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <510AB803.2010004@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:29:23 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] X86: Add a check to catch Xen emulation of Hyper-V
On 01/31/2013 08:45 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 31.01.13 at 16:53, KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>> Are there any published standards in terms of how the CPUID space should be
>> populated in the range from 0x40000000 to 0x40010000. Specifically, unless
>
> I recall having seen this range being marked as reserved for
> hypervisor use somewhere, but I don't remember where that was.
>
AFAIK Intel reserves 0x40000000 to 0x4FFFFFFF for hypervisor use.
Typically multivendor CPUID utilities expect "blocks" of 64K but that is
not in any spec that I know of.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists