[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1359657696-2767-3-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 02:41:25 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy()
Even get_work_pool() return NULL, the work may be pending.
Make work_pending() test unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 8 ++------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 973b290..d474a6c 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3443,8 +3443,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(workqueue_congested);
* Test whether @work is currently pending or running. There is no
* synchronization around this function and the test result is
* unreliable and only useful as advisory hints or for debugging.
- * Especially for reentrant wqs, the pending state might hide the
- * running state.
*
* RETURNS:
* OR'd bitmask of WORK_BUSY_* bits.
@@ -3453,15 +3451,13 @@ unsigned int work_busy(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct worker_pool *pool = get_work_pool(work);
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned int ret = 0;
+ unsigned int ret = work_pending(work) ? WORK_BUSY_PENDING : 0;
if (!pool)
- return 0;
+ return ret;
spin_lock_irqsave(&pool->lock, flags);
- if (work_pending(work))
- ret |= WORK_BUSY_PENDING;
if (find_worker_executing_work(pool, work))
ret |= WORK_BUSY_RUNNING;
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists