lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130131132706.f15f3166.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:27:06 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	xtu4 <xiaobing.tu@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, guifang.tang@...el.com,
	linX.z.chen@...el.com
Subject: Re: resend----[PATCH] Avoid high order memory allocating with
 kmalloc, when read large seq file

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:11:32 +0800
xtu4 <xiaobing.tu@...el.com> wrote:

> [SEQ_FILE] Avoid high order memory allocating with kmalloc
>   when read large seq file

The patch is still horridly mangled by your email client.

The implementation cheerfully ignores my earlier comment: "The
conventional way of doing this is to attempt the kmalloc with
__GFP_NOWARN and if that failed, fall back to vmalloc()."

This code has existed for ten years and this is the first time anyone
has encountered this problem.  Rather than mucking around with the
seq_file code to attempt to fix this, it would be better to fix the
calling code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ