linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: add penalty for forcing a maintainer to edit a patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1359733687.17807.7.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Fri, 01 Feb 2013 07:48:07 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: add penalty for forcing a maintainer
 to edit a patch

On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 16:43 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> Maintainers have to hand-edit patches (body of patches and changelog
> entries) all the time.  There needs to be some kind of penalty put into
> place to keep developers from abusing maintainers.

No, there doesn't.

It's funny as a joke, it's not as an actual patch.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/