[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <510BF096.7060705@yandex.ru>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:43:02 +0400
From: Mike Lykov <combr@...dex.ru>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
kirill@...temov.name
Subject: Re: [BUG?] false positive in soft lockup detector while unlzma initramfs
on slow cpu
01.02.2013 19:59, Don Zickus пишет:
> Hmm, that seems to make sense. I was expecting that problem to pop up on
> my end but didn't see. I just asusmed the boot code didn't use that
> decompressor.
Can you accumulate all our discussion and create one right-coded,
kernelcode-styled patch?
> Though I am not sure why that is leading to your other PATA problems
> below. Did you have similar problems when you used other decompression
> levels?
In past - no. But I not test this last kernel variant with other level.
> I am not sure how to explain the differences.
I think this is similar as decompress:
Kernel stop and wait next try in "default_idle()" for 20-30 sec, and in
this moment softlockup detector panics ;)
But without patch for touch_softlockup_watchdog in
decompress_unlzma+misc.c it works (try, fail, pause, try, fail, go on).
--
Mike
Sapienti sat.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists