lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <510B50DA.6010201@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Feb 2013 10:51:30 +0530
From:	kishon <kishon@...com>
To:	<balbi@...com>
CC:	Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@...il.com>,
	Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] usb: dwc3: Get PHY from platform specific dwc3 dt
 node.

Hi,

On Thursday 31 January 2013 09:08 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:00:37PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Hi Felipe,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:53:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>>>>> Moreover, SoCs having multiple dwc3 controllers will have multiple
>>>>>> PHYs, which eventually be added using usb_add_phy_dev(), and not
>>>>>> using usb_add_phy(). So each dwc3 controller won't be able to
>>>>>> get PHYs by simply calling devm_usb_get_phy() also.
>>>>>
>>>>> No. We have added usb_get_phy_dev() for that purpose in the case of non-dt.
>>>>> I think, instead you can have a patch to use devm_usb_get_phy_dev() here and
>>>>> in exynos platform specific code use usb_bind_phy() to bind the phy and
>>>>> controller till you change it to dt.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We have dt support for dwc3-exynos, in such case we should go ahead with
>>>> of_platform_populate(), right ?
>>>> But if when i use of_platform_populate() i will not be able to set
>>>> dma_mask to dwc3->dev. :-(

You can do something like this

static u64 dwc3_exynos_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);

static int dwc3_exynos_set_dmamask(struct device *dev, void *c)
{
	dev->dma_mask = &dwc3_exynos_dma_mask;

	return 0;
}

And in your probe after of_platform_populate, you can add

device_for_each_child(&pdev->dev, NULL, dwc3_exynos_set_dmamask);

Here pdev is the platform device of dwc3-exynos. By this way all the 
children of dwc3-exynos will have dma_mask set to the required value.

I'm not sure if there is any other better way to achieve the same 
(without patching of.c ;-))

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ