[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 23:53:15 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] f2fs: optimize the return condition for has_not_enough_free_secs
From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Instead of evaluating the free_sections and then deciding to return
true/false from that path. We can directly use the evaluation condition
for returning proper value.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@...sung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.h | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
index a9417b9..458bf5c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
@@ -464,10 +464,8 @@ static inline bool has_not_enough_free_secs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
if (sbi->por_doing)
return false;
- if (free_sections(sbi) <= (node_secs + 2 * dent_secs +
- reserved_sections(sbi)))
- return true;
- return false;
+ return (free_sections(sbi) <= (node_secs + 2 * dent_secs +
+ reserved_sections(sbi)));
}
static inline int utilization(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists