linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [DONOTAPPLY] [PATCH] enhanceio: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:25:29 -0800
From:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To:	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
	Amit Kale <akale@...c-inc.com>,
	linux-bcache <linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jason Warr <jason@...r.net>,
	thornber@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [DONOTAPPLY] [PATCH] enhanceio: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching
 software for Linux kernel

Also, where's the end user documentation?

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> This is a patch to migrate STEC's enhanceio driver out of their github
>>> repository and into the staging tree.  From their README:
>>>
>>> "EnhanceIO driver is based on EnhanceIO SSD caching software product developed
>>> by STEC Inc. EnhanceIO was derived from Facebook's open source Flashcache
>>> project. EnhanceIO uses SSDs as cache devices for traditional rotating hard
>>> disk drives (referred to as source volumes throughout this document).
>>> EnhanceIO can work with any block device, be it an entire physical disk, an
>>> individual disk partition,  a RAIDed DAS device, a SAN volume, a device mapper
>>> volume or a software RAID (md) device."
>>
>> What's your take on the benefits of this vs bcache ?
>
> I've been trying to review it it for cache coherency and consistency
> wrt. power failures, but the complete lack of high level documentation
> is making that difficult.
>
> I saw some benchmarks the other day where on writes EIO was faster
> than the raw device, which was... suspicious.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/