linux-kernel - Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:04:46 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.

On Thursday, January 31, 2013 02:10:34 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:12:58PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Yes, there are two bugs in e1000e, it appears. Konstantin's
> > patch [2/5] fixes one of them, but the other one has to be fixed
> > differently.
> >
> > Boris, would you be able to test a couple of e1000e patches for me?
> 
> Sure, send them on. You can add 2/5 in the mix too.

There you go.

The [2/5] is at: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2001211/

The other two are attached.  I suppose the ordering doesn't matter.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
View attachment "pci-pm-fix-e1000e-runtime-suspend.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2247 bytes)

View attachment "pci-pm-clear-state_saved-during-suspend.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1029 bytes)