[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130203170213.GQ8476@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:02:13 +0100
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>
Cc: Agócs Pál <agocs.pal.86@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lpc_ich: fix gpio base and control offsets
Hi Arron,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:52:39PM -0600, Aaron Sierra wrote:
> In ICH5 and earlier the GPIOBASE and GPIOCTRL registers are found at
> offsets 0x58 and 0x5C, respectively. This patch allows GPIO access to
> properly be enabled (and disabled) for these chipsets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Agócs Pál <agocs.pal.86@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
I applied this one to my for-next branch, but:
> @@ -858,14 +874,35 @@ wdt_done:
> static int lpc_ich_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
> + struct lpc_ich_priv *priv;
> int ret;
> bool cell_added = false;
>
> - ret = lpc_ich_init_wdt(dev, id);
> + priv = kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL, sizeof(struct lpc_ich_priv));
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Could you please come back to me with a follow up patch that would convert
this to the devm_kzalloc() API ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists