| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2520964.6C1RTjdEJr@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:38 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Myron Stowe <mstowe@...hat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/8] ACPI, PCI: avoid building pci_slot as module
On Sunday, February 03, 2013 03:47:15 PM Myron Stowe wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 14:09 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:07:42 AM Jiang Liu wrote:
> > >> As discussed in thread at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1946851/,
> > >> there's no value in supporting CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT=m any more.
> > >> So change Kconfig and code to only support building pci_slot as
> > >> built-in driver.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> >
> > I think we should eventually get rid of acpi_pci_register_driver() and
> > do this initialization directly from acpi_pci_root_add(). But
> > removing the module option here is a good first step.
>
> Bjorn, Rafael:
>
> If either of you are interested in that still let me know and I can
> re-work any or all of the "PCI/ACPI: Remove "pci_root" sub-driver
> support" series - https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/7/11
I am. However, I think it's better to wait with the rework until our trees
are merged into the mainline, so that you can base the patchset on a common
tree.
> Note [PATCH 13/15] was effectively the same as below and continued on
> with initializing directly from acpi_pci_root_add() in [PATCH 14/15].
> There may have been worthwhile fixes in some of the earlier content such
> as [PATCH 11/15] worth re-considering also.
Well, as I said. All of the patches in the series making sense after v3.9-rc1
will be interesting to me certainly.
Thanks,
Rafael
> > Rafael, do you want to apply this (and [6/8]) via your tree? If not,
> > I can take it.
> >
> > >> ---
> > >> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +----
> > >> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 5 +++++
> > >> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c | 13 +------------
> > >> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
> > >> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> > >> index 0300bf6..7efd0d0 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> > >> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE
> > >> is about half of the penalty and is rarely useful.
> > >>
> > >> config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> > >> - tristate "PCI slot detection driver"
> > >> + bool "PCI slot detection driver"
> > >> depends on SYSFS
> > >> default n
> > >> help
> > >> @@ -308,9 +308,6 @@ config ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> > >> i.e., segment/bus/device/function tuples, with physical slots in
> > >> the system. If you are unsure, say N.
> > >>
> > >> - To compile this driver as a module, choose M here:
> > >> - the module will be called pci_slot.
> > >> -
> > >> config X86_PM_TIMER
> > >> bool "Power Management Timer Support" if EXPERT
> > >> depends on X86
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > >> index e050254..7374cfc 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> > >> @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ struct acpi_ec {
> > >>
> > >> extern struct acpi_ec *first_ec;
> > >>
> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT
> > >> +void acpi_pci_slot_init(void);
> > >> +#else
> > >> +static inline void acpi_pci_slot_init(void) { }
> > >> +#endif
> > >> int acpi_pci_root_init(void);
> > >> int acpi_ec_init(void);
> > >> int acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(void);
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> > >> index d22585f..a7d7e77 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c
> > >> @@ -330,19 +330,8 @@ static struct dmi_system_id acpi_pci_slot_dmi_table[] __initdata = {
> > >> {}
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >> -static int __init
> > >> -acpi_pci_slot_init(void)
> > >> +void __init acpi_pci_slot_init(void)
> > >> {
> > >> dmi_check_system(acpi_pci_slot_dmi_table);
> > >> acpi_pci_register_driver(&acpi_pci_slot_driver);
> > >> - return 0;
> > >> }
> > >> -
> > >> -static void __exit
> > >> -acpi_pci_slot_exit(void)
> > >> -{
> > >> - acpi_pci_unregister_driver(&acpi_pci_slot_driver);
> > >> -}
> > >> -
> > >> -module_init(acpi_pci_slot_init);
> > >> -module_exit(acpi_pci_slot_exit);
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > >> index f8a0d0f..cb964ac 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > >> @@ -1732,6 +1732,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> > >>
> > >> acpi_power_init();
> > >> acpi_pci_root_init();
> > >> + acpi_pci_slot_init();
> > >>
> > >> /*
> > >> * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
> > >>
> > > --
> > > I speak only for myself.
> > > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists